Screener
VOTE vs IGM
TCW Transform 500 ETF vs iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Key differences
- VOTE costs 0.34% less per year.
- IGM is significantly larger than VOTE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IGM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VOTE | IGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.05% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $9.5B |
| Since | 2021 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 0.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.9% | +59.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.5% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +21.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 1.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.21% | 20.34% |
| Max drawdown | -25.70% | -40.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VOTE and IGM
Explore further