Screener
VOTE vs SUPP
TCW Transform 500 ETF vs TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF
Key differences
- VOTE costs 0.70% less per year.
- VOTE is significantly larger than SUPP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VOTE covers north america markets; SUPP covers global.
- VOTE follows a index tracking strategy; SUPP uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, VOTE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VOTE | SUPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.05% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $12M |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 0.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.9% | +31.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.5% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.21% | 19.39% |
| Max drawdown | -25.70% | -25.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VOTE and SUPP
Explore further