Screener
VOTE vs GRW
TCW Transform 500 ETF vs TCW Durable Growth ETF
Key differences
- VOTE costs 0.70% less per year.
- VOTE is significantly larger than GRW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VOTE follows a index tracking strategy; GRW uses active selection.
- GRW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VOTE | GRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.05% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $72M |
| Since | 2021 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 0.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.9% | -7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.21% | 14.49% |
| Max drawdown | -25.70% | -23.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VOTE and GRW
Explore further