Screener
VPL vs IPAC
Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
- VPL is significantly larger than IPAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VPL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VPL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VPL | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.1B | $2.5B |
| Since | 2001 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.99% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.9% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.41% | 16.58% |
| Max drawdown | -33.89% | -31.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VPL and IPAC
Explore further