Screener
IPAC vs FLAX
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF vs Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- IPAC costs 0.10% less per year.
- IPAC is significantly larger than FLAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FLAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAC | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $47M |
| Since | 2014 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.92% | 2.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +48.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.58% | 18.62% |
| Max drawdown | -31.00% | -42.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPAC and FLAX
Explore further