Screener
VRAI vs XNAV
Virtus Real Asset Income ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- VRAI costs 0.72% less per year.
- VRAI is classified as equity, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- VRAI follows a index tracking strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRAI | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $31M |
| Since | 2019 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 3.19% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +44.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.9% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.93% | 16.54% |
| Max drawdown | -47.51% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VRAI and XNAV
Explore further