Screener
VRIG vs PFFV
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF vs Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
Both VRIG and PFFV are fixed income ETFs. VRIG charges 0.30% a year and PFFV 0.25%. The main difference: VRIG follows a active selection strategy; PFFV uses index tracking.
- VRIG follows a active selection strategy; PFFV uses index tracking.
- VRIG is much larger than PFFV. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, PFFV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRIG | PFFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $306M |
| Since | 2016 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 4.80% | 8.11% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.0% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.0% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.4% | +2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.84 | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.50% | 4.12% |
| Max drawdown | -13.04% | -18.95% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.