Screener
VSMV vs CDC
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF vs VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
Key differences
- CDC is significantly larger than VSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VSMV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VSMV | CDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $153M | $737M |
| Since | 2017 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.32% | 3.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.6% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.6% | +12.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.20% | 9.85% |
| Max drawdown | -31.33% | -21.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VSMV and CDC
Explore further