Screener
VSMV vs CFA
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF vs VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF
Key differences
- CFA is significantly larger than VSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VSMV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VSMV | CFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $153M | $532M |
| Since | 2017 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.32% | 1.25% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.6% | +14.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.6% | +14.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.20% | 10.91% |
| Max drawdown | -31.33% | -37.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VSMV and CFA
Explore further