Screener
WZRD vs FFLS
Opportunistic Trader ETF vs The Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Key differences
Both WZRD and FFLS are alternative ETFs. WZRD charges 1.00% a year and FFLS 1.60%. The main difference: WZRD follows a structured outcome strategy; FFLS uses long short.
- WZRD follows a structured outcome strategy; FFLS uses long short.
- WZRD costs 0.60% less per year.
- FFLS is much larger than WZRD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| WZRD | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 1.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $43M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -4.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.33% |
| Max drawdown | -79.00% | -11.05% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.