Screener
XCEM vs EEM
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- XCEM costs 0.56% less per year.
- EEM is significantly larger than XCEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XCEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCEM | EEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $28.1B |
| Since | 2015 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 2.71% | 1.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +67.6% | +51.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.8% | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.78% | 19.88% |
| Max drawdown | -40.92% | -39.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCEM and EEM
Explore further