Screener
XCEM vs EMXC
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
Key differences
- XCEM costs 0.09% less per year.
- EMXC is significantly larger than XCEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EMXC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCEM | EMXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $22.1B |
| Since | 2015 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.71% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +67.6% | +73.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.8% | +13.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.78% | 21.58% |
| Max drawdown | -40.92% | -42.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCEM and EMXC
Explore further