Screener
XCLR vs RYLD
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- XCLR costs 0.35% less per year.
- RYLD is significantly larger than XCLR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XCLR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCLR | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.98% | 11.85% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.8% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.0% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.7% | +2.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.75% | 10.82% |
| Max drawdown | -46.74% | -41.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCLR and RYLD
Explore further