Screener
XCLR vs RYLG
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
- XCLR costs 0.10% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCLR | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $8M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.98% | 7.42% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.8% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.0% | +13.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.75% | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -46.74% | -22.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCLR and RYLG
Explore further