Screener
XCLR vs XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- XCLR costs 0.35% less per year.
- XYLD is significantly larger than XCLR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XCLR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCLR | XYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $3.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.98% | 10.61% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.3% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +11.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.5% | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.77% | 6.73% |
| Max drawdown | -46.74% | -33.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCLR and XYLD
Explore further