Screener
XCOR vs MATE
Fundx ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
XCOR is an equity ETF, while MATE is an alternative ETF. XCOR charges 1.15% a year and MATE 0.97%.
- XCOR is an equity fund, while MATE is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- XCOR follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- MATE costs 0.18% less per year.
- XCOR is much larger than MATE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- XCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCOR | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.15% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $193M | $39M |
| Since | 2001 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.61% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.54% | -13.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.