Screener
XFLX vs FDEM
FundX Flexible ETF vs Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- FDEM costs 0.72% less per year.
- FDEM is significantly larger than XFLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XFLX is classified as fixed income, while FDEM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- XFLX follows a active selection strategy; FDEM uses index tracking.
- XFLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XFLX | FDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $49M | $508M |
| Since | 2002 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 9.73% | 2.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +42.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.53% | 17.19% |
| Max drawdown | -6.54% | -33.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XFLX and FDEM
Explore further