Screener
XLB vs SETM
State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF vs Sprott Critical Materials ETF
Key differences
- XLB costs 0.57% less per year.
- XLB is significantly larger than SETM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XLB covers north america markets; SETM covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, SETM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLB | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.3B | $617M |
| Since | 1998 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.70% | 1.24% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.8% | +139.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.51 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.88% | 44.37% |
| Max drawdown | -37.27% | -42.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XLB and SETM
Explore further