Screener
SETM vs FMAT
Sprott Critical Materials ETF vs Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
Key differences
- FMAT costs 0.57% less per year.
- SETM covers global markets; FMAT covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, SETM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FMAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SETM | FMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $617M | $603M |
| Since | 2023 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | 1.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +139.8% | +24.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.4% | +12.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.54 |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.37% | 17.76% |
| Max drawdown | -42.81% | -41.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SETM and FMAT
Explore further