Screener
XLB vs SMN
State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF vs ProShares UltraShort Materials
Key differences
- XLB costs 0.87% less per year.
- XLB is significantly larger than SMN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XLB follows a index tracking strategy; SMN uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, XLB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLB | SMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.3B | $3M |
| Since | 1998 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.70% | 4.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.8% | -31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | -16.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.5% | -14.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.51 | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.88% | 34.14% |
| Max drawdown | -37.27% | -95.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XLB and SMN
Explore further