Screener
XLC vs FCOM
State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF vs Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF
Key differences
- XLC is significantly larger than FCOM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FCOM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FCOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLC | FCOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25.6B | $1.8B |
| Since | 2018 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.20% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.5% | +27.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.1% | +26.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.16% | 15.32% |
| Max drawdown | -46.65% | -46.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XLC and FCOM
Explore further