Screener
XLG vs KAUG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - August
Key differences
- XLG costs 0.59% less per year.
- XLG is significantly larger than KAUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XLG is classified as equity, while KAUG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- XLG follows a index tracking strategy; KAUG uses structured outcome.
- XLG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLG | KAUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $80M |
| Since | 2005 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.63% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.50% | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -30.46% | -15.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XLG and KAUG
Explore further