Screener
XME vs SLVP
State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
Key differences
- XME is significantly larger than SLVP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SLVP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XME has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XME | SLVP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $945M |
| Since | 2006 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 1.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +99.9% | +129.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +36.1% | +50.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.0% | +16.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.18% | 52.87% |
| Max drawdown | -61.69% | -62.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XME and SLVP
Explore further