Screener
XME vs NANR
State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- XME is significantly larger than NANR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XME is classified as equity, while NANR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, XME has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XME has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XME | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $795M |
| Since | 2006 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +106.2% | +53.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +38.7% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +23.5% | +16.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.35% | 18.21% |
| Max drawdown | -61.69% | -49.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XME and NANR
Explore further