Screener
XMHQ vs CZA
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF vs Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both XMHQ and CZA are equity ETFs. XMHQ charges 0.25% a year and CZA 0.69%. The main difference: XMHQ costs 0.44% less per year.
- XMHQ costs 0.44% less per year.
- XMHQ is much larger than CZA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, XMHQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMHQ | CZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $184M |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 1.47% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.9% | +14.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +14.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.57% | 12.79% |
| Max drawdown | -36.90% | -46.18% |
Similar to XMHQ and CZA
Explore further