Screener
XMHQ vs RESM
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- XMHQ follows a index tracking strategy; RESM uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMHQ | RESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.2B | — |
| Since | 2006 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.63% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.90% | -8.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XMHQ and RESM
Explore further