Skip to content
Screener

XNAV vs BDYN

FundX Aggressive ETF vs iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF

XNAV

FundX Aggressive ETF

Annual cost

1.27%

Fund size

$34M

BDYN

iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$2.9B

Key differences

XNAV is an alternative ETF, while BDYN is a mixed asset ETF. XNAV charges 1.27% a year and BDYN 0.40%.

  • XNAV is an alternative fund, while BDYN is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • BDYN costs 0.87% less per year.
  • BDYN is much larger than XNAV. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

XNAVBDYN
Annual cost (TER)1.27%0.40%
Fund size (AUM)$34M$2.9B
Since20022017
Dividend yield0.47%0.91%
Asset classalternativemixed asset
Region
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+39.1%N/A
CAGR 3Y+24.2%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.03N/A
Volatility 1Y17.88%
Max drawdown-24.27%-10.85%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to XNAV and BDYN