Screener
XNAV vs BFLX
FundX Aggressive ETF vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
XNAV is an alternative ETF, while BFLX is an equity ETF. XNAV charges 1.27% a year and BFLX 0.40%.
- XNAV is an alternative fund, while BFLX is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- BFLX costs 0.87% less per year.
- XNAV is much larger than BFLX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $11M |
| Since | 2002 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.47% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.46% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -3.87% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.