Screener
XNAV vs EAOM
FundX Aggressive ETF vs iShares ESG Aware 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF
Key differences
- EAOM costs 1.09% less per year.
- XNAV is significantly larger than EAOM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XNAV is classified as alternative, while EAOM is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | EAOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $8M |
| Since | 2002 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 2.84% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | +14.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.6% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.40% | 6.47% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -20.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XNAV and EAOM
Explore further