Screener
XNAV vs FCEF
FundX Aggressive ETF vs First Trust Income Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- XNAV costs 2.42% less per year.
- XNAV is classified as alternative, while FCEF is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | FCEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 3.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $75M |
| Since | 2002 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 6.24% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +44.5% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.0% | +16.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.54% | 7.86% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -44.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XNAV and FCEF
Explore further