Screener
XNAV vs FFOX
FundX Aggressive ETF vs FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- FFOX costs 0.25% less per year.
- FFOX is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XNAV is classified as alternative, while FFOX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | FFOX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 1.02% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $217M |
| Since | 2002 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.40% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -12.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XNAV and FFOX
Explore further