Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

XNAV vs ISSB

FundX Aggressive ETF vs IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF

XNAV

FundX Aggressive ETF

Annual cost

1.27%

Fund size

$34M

ISSB

IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF

Annual cost

1.14%

Fund size

$2M

Key differences

Both XNAV and ISSB are alternative ETFs. XNAV charges 1.27% a year and ISSB 1.14%. The main difference: XNAV follows a active selection strategy; ISSB uses option income.

  • XNAV follows a active selection strategy; ISSB uses option income.
  • ISSB costs 0.13% less per year.
  • XNAV is much larger than ISSB. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

XNAVISSB
Annual cost (TER)1.27%1.14%
Fund size (AUM)$34M$2M
Since20022026
Dividend yield0.47%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1Y+36.3%N/A
CAGR 3Y+24.0%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.03N/A
Volatility 1Y17.40%
Max drawdown-24.27%-30.57%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to XNAV and ISSB