Screener
XOEF vs RWL
iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- XOEF costs 0.19% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than XOEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XOEF | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $8.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.14% |
| Max drawdown | -7.66% | -36.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XOEF and RWL
Explore further