Screener
XRLX vs AGOX
FundX Conservative ETF vs Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- XRLX costs 0.13% less per year.
- AGOX is significantly larger than XRLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XRLX is classified as mixed asset, while AGOX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XRLX | AGOX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.20% | 1.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $364M |
| Since | 2002 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.68% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.9% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.13% | 18.35% |
| Max drawdown | -15.34% | -27.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XRLX and AGOX
Explore further