Screener
XRLX vs AOM
FundX Conservative ETF vs iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOM costs 1.05% less per year.
- AOM is significantly larger than XRLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XRLX follows a active selection strategy; AOM uses index tracking.
- XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XRLX | AOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.20% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2002 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.68% | 3.04% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.7% | +15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.09% | 6.55% |
| Max drawdown | -15.34% | -19.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XRLX and AOM
Explore further