Screener
XRMI vs GAL
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF vs State Street Global Allocation ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 0.25% less per year.
- GAL is significantly larger than XRMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XRMI follows a option income strategy; GAL uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, GAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XRMI | GAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $49M | $307M |
| Since | 2021 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 12.65% | 3.18% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.4% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.0% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.55 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.42% | 8.75% |
| Max drawdown | -15.36% | -28.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XRMI and GAL
Explore further