Screener
XT vs BPAY
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF vs iShares FinTech Active ETF
Key differences
- XT costs 0.09% less per year.
- XT is significantly larger than BPAY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XT is classified as equity, while BPAY is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- XT follows a index tracking strategy; BPAY uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, XT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XT | BPAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.9B | $9M |
| Since | 2015 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.7% | -5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.5% | +9.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.36 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.93% | 25.59% |
| Max drawdown | -34.41% | -33.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XT and BPAY
Explore further