Screener
XT vs IWM
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 0.27% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than XT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XT | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.9B | $76.9B |
| Since | 2015 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.8% | +44.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.6% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.06% | 19.29% |
| Max drawdown | -34.41% | -41.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XT and IWM
Explore further