Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

XT vs SPXE

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF vs ProShares S&P 500 ex-Energy ETF

XT

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.46%

Fund size

$3.9B

SPXE

ProShares S&P 500 ex-Energy ETF

ProShares

Annual cost

0.09%

Fund size

$80M

Key differences

  • SPXE costs 0.37% less per year.
  • XT is significantly larger than SPXE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SPXE has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

XTSPXE
Annual cost (TER)0.46%0.09%
Fund size (AUM)$3.9B$80M
Since20152015
Dividend yield0.86%0.96%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+45.8%+30.6%
CAGR 3Y+19.6%+23.3%
CAGR 5Y+8.7%+14.1%
Sharpe 3Y0.861.23
Volatility 1Y16.06%12.58%
Max drawdown-34.41%-32.27%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to XT and SPXE