Screener
XT vs SPXN
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF vs ProShares S&P 500 ex-Financials ETF
Key differences
- SPXN costs 0.37% less per year.
- XT is significantly larger than SPXN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPXN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XT | SPXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.9B | $74M |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.8% | +36.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.6% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | +15.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.06% | 12.82% |
| Max drawdown | -34.41% | -32.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XT and SPXN
Explore further