Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

XTJL vs RWL

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF

XTJL

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July

Innovator ETFs

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$21M

RWL

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF

Invesco

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$8.8B

Key differences

  • RWL costs 0.40% less per year.
  • RWL is significantly larger than XTJL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • XTJL is classified as alternative, while RWL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • XTJL follows a structured outcome strategy; RWL uses index tracking.
  • Over the last 3 years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

XTJLRWL
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.39%
Fund size (AUM)$21M$8.8B
Since20212008
Dividend yield0.00%1.28%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategystructured outcomeindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+18.4%+29.1%
CAGR 3Y+15.3%+20.2%
CAGR 5YN/A+13.3%
Sharpe 3Y0.901.28
Volatility 1Y7.64%10.12%
Max drawdown-23.24%-36.04%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to XTJL and RWL