Screener
XTN vs KOMP
State Street SPDR S&P Transportation ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
Key differences
- KOMP costs 0.15% less per year.
- KOMP is significantly larger than XTN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KOMP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XTN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XTN | KOMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $2.7B |
| Since | 2011 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.70% | 1.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.2% | +49.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.1% | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 28.19% | 23.05% |
| Max drawdown | -43.77% | -50.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XTN and KOMP
Explore further