Screener
XTN vs HAIL
State Street SPDR S&P Transportation ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF
Key differences
- XTN costs 0.10% less per year.
- XTN is significantly larger than HAIL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XTN covers north america markets; HAIL covers global.
- XTN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XTN | HAIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $20M |
| Since | 2011 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.70% | 1.68% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.2% | +55.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.1% | -4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.56 | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 28.19% | 29.08% |
| Max drawdown | -43.77% | -65.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XTN and HAIL
Explore further