Screener
XTN vs SIMS
State Street SPDR S&P Transportation ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF
Key differences
- XTN costs 0.10% less per year.
- XTN is significantly larger than SIMS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XTN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XTN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XTN | SIMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $9M |
| Since | 2011 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.70% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.2% | +43.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | +13.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.1% | +1.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.56 | 0.50 |
| Volatility 1Y | 28.19% | 23.26% |
| Max drawdown | -43.77% | -43.97% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XTN and SIMS
Explore further