Screener
XUSP vs FDG
Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF vs American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Key differences
- FDG costs 0.34% less per year.
- FDG is significantly larger than XUSP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XUSP is classified as alternative, while FDG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- XUSP follows a structured outcome strategy; FDG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XUSP | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $44M | $387M |
| Since | 2022 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.1% | +37.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.9% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.14 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.98% | 17.85% |
| Max drawdown | -22.59% | -43.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XUSP and FDG
Explore further