Screener
XYLD vs BCCC
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF vs Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- XYLD costs 0.15% less per year.
- XYLD is significantly larger than BCCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XYLD | BCCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $10M |
| Since | 2013 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 10.61% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.73% | — |
| Max drawdown | -33.46% | -42.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XYLD and BCCC
Explore further