Screener
XYLD vs XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
Key differences
- XCLR costs 0.35% less per year.
- XYLD is significantly larger than XCLR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XCLR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XYLD | XCLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $3M |
| Since | 2013 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 10.61% | 0.98% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.7% | +15.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.6% | +14.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.2% | -1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.78 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.71% | 8.75% |
| Max drawdown | -33.46% | -46.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XYLD and XCLR
Explore further