Screener
YINN vs FXP
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares vs ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
Key differences
- FXP costs 0.39% less per year.
- YINN is significantly larger than FXP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- YINN is classified as cryptocurrency, while FXP is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- YINN follows a leveraged strategy; FXP uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, YINN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| YINN | FXP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.34% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $766M | $6M |
| Since | 2009 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 4.39% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.0% | -4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -5.5% | -29.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -37.5% | -17.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.31 | -0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 58.22% | 38.91% |
| Max drawdown | -98.59% | -94.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YINN and FXP
Explore further