Screener
ZAP vs FRNW
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF vs Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- FRNW costs 0.11% less per year.
- ZAP is significantly larger than FRNW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZAP | FRNW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $456M | $141M |
| Since | 2024 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.0% | +84.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.77% | 25.62% |
| Max drawdown | -12.38% | -59.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZAP and FRNW
Explore further