Screener
ZFEB vs RFV
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- RFV costs 0.44% less per year.
- ZFEB is classified as alternative, while RFV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- ZFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; RFV uses index tracking.
- RFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZFEB | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $313M |
| Since | 2025 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.4% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.23% | 18.26% |
| Max drawdown | -3.00% | -52.24% |
Similar to ZFEB and RFV
Explore further